|
Listen to the Audio of this discourse
Download the Audio
[Swamiji leads the audience in chanting]
The Upanishads are well known as what is known as adhyatma vidya,
meaning thereby, an insight into the Self, the wisdom of the Self, knowledge
of the Self - an experience which cannot, in any manner whatsoever, alienate
itself into other than what it is. Our experience in this world today, normally
speaking, is involved in what can be designated as anatman, the non-Self
as it is called, because it is our daily experience - an experience of
what we are not. We see the world; we see people; we see human relations. And,
all that we can consider as 'life', in today's parlance,
is far removed from the true Self.
The characteristic of a Self is what usually eludes the grasp of the sense
organs in their search for the Self, of a true satisfaction of themselves.
In this world of anatman, or non-Self, we are actually searching for
the Self - very mysteriously, maybe very unfortunately. Though inasmuch
as the world appears as an object of our sense organs, it has to be considered
as an anatman, or a not-Self. The intention behind our pursuit of
the anatman is actually the pursuit of the Atman. Unknowingly,
groping in the dark as it were, we are searching for our own selves, and search
for the Atman in a locality where it is not.
The characteristic of the world has to be distinguished from the characteristic
of selfhood. This peculiar distinction between the two principles is what becomes
difficult for the mind and the senses to grasp. And it is precisely this difficulty
that compels the senses, together with the mind, to run in a direction totally
opposite to the Self - though for the purpose of the grasp of the Self
only. In the commentary on the Brahma Sutra, Acharya Shankara, perhaps while
expounding the meaning of the fourth sutra, he makes a reference to
three kinds of 'selves', to which we have made some reference earlier
in our sessions.
That is to say, there is a self which we pursue through the sense organs,
which is the object-self - the vishaya, the anatmantatva,
the gaunatman as it is usually called, the secondary self. An object
of affection is also an object of such attraction and self-identification,
in an empirical way, that it mostly passes for the Self. The object of love,
which is called the gaunatman - is apparently a kind of self for
that state of affairs where the concerned object is erroneously attempted to
be identified with the true Self - erroneously because of the fact that
what is outside the Self cannot be identified with the Self.
The outsideness of the object is the difficulty involved in the actual possession,
identification, and the expected enjoyment thereof. All objects which are beloved
to the sense organs are incapable of that identification which they are actually
expecting in their adventure or pursuits. The sense organs externalise the
consciousness: parcaci khani vytranat svayambhus tasmat paran pasyati nantaratman.
The force of the movement of the senses is so very powerfully extrovert that
the consciousness, which otherwise cannot be so extroverted, is charged with
this velocity of movement in an externalised fashion; and the Self also moves - as
it were, though not really - in the direction of an outside object; envelops
it, as it were, in terms of the activity of the mind, and is supposed to feel
itself in that object in a totally inverted fashion - topsy-turvy fashion.
The king, acting as a fool, as it were, in a drama - the Atman becomes
the fool, to some extent we may say, in a metaphorical style, when it begins
to behold itself in what is itnot. The whole of our life in this world is this
picture of dramatic activity of the sense organs - a tomfoolery, we may
say. This is the whole of life. It is the pursuit of a twofold non-Atman.
On one side it is known as the gaunatman, to which I made reference
just now - the object of attraction, love, affection, attachment; then
this body, which is called the mithyatman.
This is the whole of life in the world. All our projects and plans of work
in the world, throughout the day and the night, concern themselves with values
that are related to the physical body, which is the mithyatman, and
related to all things connected to the body, namely, the gaunatman.
The protection of this body, the ego-individuality, and the protection simultaneously
of everything that is connected with this bodily individuality - we may
say family circumstances, for instance, and every other related object and
condition conducive to the satisfaction of the ego-individuality - is the
picture of empirical life.
In one sense, we may say this world is a dream. It is a dream because it is
a drama played by consciousness in the same manner as it plays it or enacts
it in the well-known dream world. An otherwise impossible phenomenon takes
place, namely, the projection of a Self in the location of the non-Self. It
is well known that the Self cannot become the non-Self. The very meaningattached
to the word 'Self' is such that it cannot become what it is not;
and non-externality is the characteristic of the Self. Consciousness cannot
become unconsciousness. It cannot see itself as a distant object, separated
by space and time. That is, beholding consciousness as an object of itself,
as it were, is an impossibility, logically speaking; according to common sense
also it is contrary. But such a thing happens in dream. The perceiver of the
dream becomesthe perceived object also - a well-known phenomenon, into
which region we need not traverse now.
A similar structural involvement takes place in the waking world. The structure
of dream is the same as the structure of waking. That is, the pattern of the
operation of consciousness in dream is similar to the pattern in waking. There
has to be a location which perceives; and that perceiver has to be a centre
of awareness. There has to be another thing that is outside, which is the object
thereof. And there must be a medium of perception: pranamana, a pryatakshana for
the time being. The same is the structure of waking awareness. There is an
object that is known in the world with all its contents; and there is a subject:
yourself, myself, everyone from one's own point of view is the perceiver
of the world. But, the perceiver is neither the gaunatman nor the mithyatman.
The body is constituted of the five elements: earth, water, fire, air, ether - prithvi, jal, tejo, vayu, akash.
The object that is perceived also is constituted of the very same elements.
It is as if a material embodiment collides with another material embodiment.
In the language of the Bhagavad Gita: gunah guneshu vartante. The
three gunas of prakriti, which constitute all bodies, subjectivity
as well as objectivity, are unconscious in their nature. Prakriti is
non-conscious. And all the bodies constituted of the prakriti - the
physical body of ours, and the embodied form of all objects - are equally
constituted of the gunatraya: sattva, rajas, tamas.
By an analysis of our experience, we will know that neither the body nor the
mental operations are actually the conscious principle. A consciousness that
is responsible for the vision of life is not that body, not even the mind.
The avasthatraya vishesana will tell us that, though in the waking
condition we appear to be physically conscious, we are not so conscious in
dream; there is only a mental operation taking place. But in the deep sleep
state, even the mind subsides, but we exist still. We exist - just
that much onlyand nothing more can be said about ourself in that state: asti
tevo bala dhavya. That particular essentiality of our being, which is
the true self of ours, can be designated only as asti - It
is.
What were we in the state of deep sleep? We were!But what were we? What were
we at that time? The definition of that particular state is impossible because
there is no quality or adjunct which can be associated with that condition,
which was just be-ness. But, it was a state of be-ness associated
with awareness. We are generally unconscious in the state of sleep.
But, the usual well-known analysis and comparison of the waking state with
the sleeping condition brings out the fact that the memorythat we have of our
having slept the previous day is accountable only on the acceptance of the
fact of there being something like consciousness even in the state of deep
sleep. Because, no memory is possible unless there was a preceding experience,
and experience is always associated with consciousness. Unconscious experience
is unthought of.
So there is a mysterious stifled consciousness, as it were, in the state of
deep sleep; that is our essential nature. It is because of the fact of our
having sunk into that essential nature of ours in sleep, we feel refreshed
and vigorous when we wake up from sleep - strong in ourselves, more strong
than we would feel even with a good lunch given to us, because the nearer we
go to ourselves, the happier we are, and the more comfort it is that we feel
in ourselves.
What is the illustration amounting to? The point that is made out here in
the analysis of the three states is that we are neither the body, nor the mind;
we are pure Awareness. But, what are the characteristics of this awareness?
It has only one characteristic, if at all we can call it one - namely,
indivisibility. It cannot be divided into parts. There cannot be a fraction
of consciousness; it is a whole by itself. The imagination, even a supposition
of there being such a thing as a fraction or a division in consciousness, implies
the presence of consciousness - even in that gap that is so imagined. The
finitude of consciousness is unthinkable because a consciousness of finitude
implies the acceptance of the exceeding of that consciousness beyond the fact
of finitude. The awareness of finitude is the acceptance of Infinitude.
This analysis is the proof of the fact of our essentially being infinite in
our nature. Our true being is astitva - pure being, which is one
with consciousness. It is sat and chit - not 'and',
but sat-chit - as an indivisible compound. And that being-consciousness,
which we are, which is the true Self of ours, which is not the gaunatman and
which is not the mithyatman, is not merely beness-consciousness, sat-chit,
it is also indivisible in nature. That is to say, it is non-finite. It
is not located somewhere. It is not true that it is inside our body. It is
ubiquitous - all-pervading - because the notion of its being in one
place is impossible unless it exceeds itself from the very notion of that finitude.
Because of this fact, it is unthinkable how consciousness can become an object
and can become a gaunatman, which is actually what is happening in
daily life. This is the reason why we say the world is like a dream. Because,
in dream, the actuality of selfhood becomes an apparent externality of objecthood;
the apparent nature of the object-perception in dream makes it a dream. Otherwise
we would not call it a dream at all; it is a reality by itself. The dream character
of what we call 'dream' arises because of it being impossible for
a perceiving consciousness to become other than what it is. Because consciousness
is infinite, it cannot become an object of itself. Infinitude cannot have an
object before it.
Thus, on this foundation of an analysis of the indivisibility of consciousness,
the infinity of consciousness, it will follow - the infinitude of the perceiver
of anything in the world. Thus, the world cannot stand as an object in front
of consciousness. But, it has stood as an object; we see it before us. But,
if it can be conceived as a really existing thing there, in front of our perceiving
consciousness, as an object thereof, certainly we should describe this world
as a dream object, because having known that our true perceiving awareness
is infinite in its nature, the world cannot stand before it as an outside something.
So the outsideness of the world is dreamy in its nature but it has a reality
of its own from another point of view - namely, the astitva, which
is the character of the infinitude of consciousness, is at the back of even
the so-called appearance of the world.
Appearance cannot be there unless there
is a reality behind it. The so-called analogy of the snake in the rope points
out that the appearance of the snake is possible only if there is the reality
of the rope. So, there is something real even behind the appearance of the
world. That is the thing that summons consciousness in the direction of sense-perception -
raga-dvesha. It
is the Infinite actually that is summoning the Infinite in all forms of perception,
even love and hatred. This is a psychological blunder actually taking place
in usual perceptions, which are afflicted with sorrow from beginning to end,
due to which reason this world-perception is characterised by Maharishi Patanjali
as a kleshta vritti. It is a painful operation of the psyche, painful
because of the fact it is wrongly beholding things - not as they are, but
as they are not.
Apart from these two mentioned: the false Atman - namely, the gaunatman,
and the mithyatman - the bodily individuality on the one side
that is the mithyatman and the external object which is the gaunatman,
there is a third one which is the true Self, called mukhyatman. This
is the true Self into which we apparently sink in the state of deep sleep.
The unity with this Self is the work of yoga. When we say "we have to
practice yoga" and "we want Self-realisation", we are aiming
at the realisation of God. When we make statements like this, we are actually,
knowingly or unknowingly, referring to this Universal Self which is within
us and without us. It is within us as our knowing consciousness; it is without
us as the basis for the appearance of all the forms: nama-rupa prapancha.
Asti, bhati, priya, nama and rupa are
supposed to be the fivefold features of everything in the world. Asti means 'be-ness' - 'be' - everything 'is'; bhati - everything
is known; priya - everything can be a desirable thing. It has
a name because it is nama. It has a form, and it is rupa.
But the nama and the rupa - name-form complex - is
not the real character of anything.
The particular configuration of personality is due to a peculiar permutation
and combination of the three gunas of prakriti. And the combination
factor changes from one time to another time, from one birth to another birth,
from one cycle to another cycle, so that no individuality can be said to be
encased in a particular formation only. Hence, nama-rupa prapancha is
not a final reality, it is a fluxation; it is a transitory movement; it changes
from moment to moment - not merely from day to day; it is a continuous
flow - like a flame of a lamp or the movement of a river, as they usually
say. The world, which is visualised as a medley of names and forms, is not
the true nature of it. But the astitva and the bhatitva and
the priyatva - the satchidananda rupa, as we call it,
the true universality that is behind the diversity of forms, is the true Self.
So even when we look at things, we are actually looking at the universal Self - wrongly,
because we behold it through the sense organs.
When consciousness, when spirit, is beheld through the sense organs, it may
look like material objects. But, it has to be beheld through itself. The soul
has to behold itself through itself, by itself, and cannot be visualised through
any external instrumentality, because thereby it is ceases to be what it is.
When the Self is attempted to be beheld through sense organs, it becomes anatman - it
is an object - and you are an object for me, and am I an object for you
in ordinary sense perception. But, basically, we are ripples and waves, as
it were, of a vast sea of awareness which is commonly present everywhere, that
is - asti, bhati, priya, satchitananda svarupa.
The unity with it is yoga. Various systems of practice have been advocated
for the purpose of this communion of the apparent form of ours with the true
form of ours.
The apparent form is infested with various components which are the building
bricks of the individuality of a person: the body, which is made up of the
five elements; the pranas; the sense organs; the mind, with its different
functions; the buddhi, the intellect; and there is a causal sheath
inside called anandamaya kosha. The consciousness is hidden inside,
as it were, covered with a bushel, by a smoke, completely smothered by the
activity of this accretion so-called, which is the well-known pancha kosha: annamaya, pranamaya, manomaya, vijnanamaya, anandamaya.
The extrication of our true Self from involvement of these accretions is the
work of yoga. The schools of yoga differ in the manner of the handling this
particular matter.
|