|
|
Chapter XFORMS OF SACRIFICE AND CONCENTRATION
There is another important theme expounded in the Fourth Chapter,
viz., sacrifice as a practice of Yoga, in which context certain
details of the variegated methods of the performance of this
sacrifice as Yoga are delineated. The adoration of the gods,
the celestials, or the deities of religion is a sacrifice.
And any sacrifice is also a Yoga, because sacrifice means
a parting of one's own self in some measure in the direction
of the achievement of a larger Self, so that in every form
of sacrifice a lower form of self is surrendered or sacrificed
to a higher form of Self. Whenever the mind fixes its attention
on something other than itself, which is supposed to be wider
in its comprehension than the contemplating mind or the self,
that process is to be regarded as a sacrifice. A lower principle
has to be sacrificed for the sake of a higher principle. Contemplation
on a Deity, as we conceive it, is the aim of religion, wherein
the surrender of oneself in such a contemplation is implied.
This is one kind of sacrifice, a religious performance, and
it is Yoga, because it is the union of the lower with the
higher by means of adoration. The surrender of the lower self
to the higher Self is regarded as Brahma-yajna, Jnana-yajna - sacrifice
of knowledge, or sacrifice in knowledge, or through knowledge,
for the sake of union with the larger Self which is a manifestation
of Brahman, the Absolute. When the senses are withdrawn and
fixed inwardly, a sacrifice is performed, and this is also
a part of the practice of Yoga. When the senses are concentrated
on objects which are regarded as helpful in the sublimation
of desire, a kind of sacrifice is performed for the realisation
of a higher good. When the powers of the mind, the intellect
and the senses, together, are centred in the Self; or the
Consciousness within, a sacrifice is performed, and it is
a Yoga. When the vital energy inside moving in the form of
the breathing process is regulated, through systematised exhalation,
inhalation and retention known usually as Rechaka, Puraka
and Kumbhaka, a sacrifice is performed. And that is also a
way of Yoga. Any act by which the propulsion of the mind and
the senses outwardly is checked for the purpose of the utilisation
of the whole of one's consciousness for contemplation on a
'being' which includes one's own self and is therefore larger
than one's self is a great sacrifice. Whenever our joy is
shared with another, we perform a sacrifice. And the great
joy of everyone is to retain the ego. The maintenance intact
of one's own ego-sense is the greatest of satisfactions, and
when we share this satisfaction a little of the ego is diminished
in its intensity, thereby we part with a measure of our personality,
we share a little bit of our being, the lower self, by which
act we expand our consciousness in the direction of that which
includes the so-called lower self of ours as well as that
on which we are contemplating. When we were discussing about
the concept of the Deity we had touched upon this theme. All
these are Yajnas, or sacrifices, or a Tapas,
and therefore they are Yoga. Study of scriptures with concentration
and a holiness of spirit is also regarded as a sacrifice,
because concentration is involved there. But we are admonished
that sacrifices which require physical material are lower
than those forms of sacrifice where the mind alone functions
and any physical appurtenance is not necessary. A feeling
of charitableness, for instance, is an act of the mind, which
is superior to the physical expression of it by way of parting
with any external material when the inward feeling is absent.
It is the feeling that counts, and it assumes a significance
only when it is genuine, when it becomes a tendency to rise
above one's lower self to the higher Self which includes the
person or persons towards which one expresses the charitable
feelings. Any kind of austerity by which the senses are restrained
and the ego is overcome in any percentage is superior to material
sacrifices. And the highest sacrifice, or the loftiest concentration,
the greatest form of Yoga is the centring of consciousness
in the Consciousness of a larger dimension. "Dispelling all
doubts by the awakening of knowledge, and converting or transforming
every action into Yoga, root yourself in your higher Consciousness,"
are the concluding words of the Fourth Chapter, which message
is continued in the Fifth and Sixth Chapters with certain
other forms of detail.
Knowledge and action are not two different things. Samkhya and Yoga are like the obverse and reverse of the same coin. Therefore, renunciation of any kind is impossible unless the separatist tendency in one's self is overcome to the extent necessary. We always feel that we are separate from the world and from creation as a whole. This tendency to the isolation of oneself from everything outside is the opposite of Yoga, and if Yoga is a gradual movement towards the affiliation of one's self with all things, aiming at union with things finally, if Yoga means that, renunciation of any kind is impossible without this Yoga; because renunciation, at least in the spirit of the Bhagavadgita, does not mean a physical dissociation from objects or persons but a withdrawal of the consciousness of the externality of things, so that renunciation becomes a function of consciousness and not an activity of the body. Hence renunciation which is the essence of Karma-Yoga cannot be dissociated from the forms of concentration and meditation which are normally known as Yoga. Meditation and action are the same if they are to be defined in the way we have stated. When the senses move among objects, a desire is not moving, that is the caution we have to exercise when we perform actions in the world. Mostly, when we cognise or perceive things, this process is charged with a desire, a motive within. When we gaze at things or look at objects or hear things or perform any sense-function, we would realise, if we are properly investigative, that there is some kind of impulsion from inside in the direction of a self-satisfaction in the lower self, and a desireless perception is unthinkable for us. However, Yoga is not the repression of sense-activity but the freeing of sense-activity from involvement in desires which usually propel the activity. All activities get infected with some desire concerned with the ego-sense. And Yoga is a gradual freedom that is to be attained in this activity of the sense-organs by means of the dissociation of the same from this disease called desire. Activity is permissible, and the Bhagavadgita tells us that it is unavoidable, but it also insists at the same time that we have to be careful to see that desire is not going there side by side or parallelly with the activity of the senses. It is not necessary that activity should always be with some desire. In fact, the most noble form of action is desireless action. And a desireful action is really culpable, ultimately. When one realises that the impulsion of the senses in the direction of objects is a cosmic function, a thing that was explained in detail in the Third Chapter, one begins to be inwardly happy in a higher sense on account of the attunement of oneself with the great forces of the universe which are the real agents of actions and whose movement is the reason behind the movement of the senses towards the objects. As we have already noted, it is not the senses that move towards the objects; the Gunas of Prakriti move among the Gunas of Prakriti. Prakriti is moving towards Prakriti. The forces of Nature commingle with the forces of Nature, so that there are no sense-organs and there are no objects of the senses. There is a continuity of movement, which has neither a beginning nor an end, in the entire cyclic motion of cosmic activity, and we do not come into the picture there as individuals. We do not, rather, exist. What exists is the universal force. Prakriti-Shakti manifests itself as Sattva, Rajas and Tamas. We will not feel at that time that we are doing anything at all, just as when a vehicle is moving, in which we are seated, we do not feel that we have made any contribution to this movement. We are taken by the force of the movement of the vehicle. This is a hard thing for the mind to entertain, because no human being is accustomed to think in this manner. We have a stereotyped way of thinking which is the traditional outlook of life, which is essentially selfish, personal and materialistic, physical and rooted in the utter isolatedness of sense from the whole of the environment. The very quintessence of Yoga practice is stated in two verses towards the end of the Fifth Chapter, which is detailed out in an expanded form in the Sixth Chapter. The contact of the senses with objects outside has to be severed. This is the first instruction. Here we are likely to make a mistake in understanding the meaning of this statement. The objects have to be severed from their contact with the senses. Generally what we understand by this suggestion is that we should run away physically from the objects. Geographically there has to be a movement from place to place, from where the objects are located. We move to go to other places where these objects are not available. This is the crudest and the lowest form of renunciation. But we have been cautioned in one place, in the Second Chapter, that physical isolation need not necessarily mean absence of desire for things. The mind may not be dissociated from its contemplated objects, while physically there may be a distance between the body and the objects. The severing of the senses from the objects of their perception means here, in this context, not merely a physical distance to be maintained between ourselves and the objects, but the extrication of our consciousness from the clutches of externality or objectivity and coming to a realisation or experience that the objects are not really externally placed. To come back to the theme of the Third Chapter, again, we have to be convinced at the bottom of our being that the objects are not placed externally in space and time. This is a mistaken view of the mind. If they are not really external to us, there cannot be any sensory contact with them, and, therefore, there is no question of a desire for them. The whole thing drops at one stroke. This is true renunciation, and this is abiding, and this is the significance of this admonition that there should be a severance of the senses from the objects of the senses.
The gaze or the attention is to be fixed in the centre where
the mind is located. This is a little bit of psychic instruction.
Esoteric psychology holds that the mind has a certain location.
In the waking state it is supposed to be functioning through
the brain, and its root is supposed to be the point between
the two eyebrows. In the condition of dream, the mind is said
to be moving through the nerve centre located in the throat,
or the region of the neck, and in the condition of deep sleep
the mind goes down into the heart, and that is the ultimate
seat of the mind. Here, in the verses referred to in the Fifth
Chapter, we are told that the mind has to be concentrated
on the point between the two eyebrows. The gaze has to be
fixed on the Ajna-chakra, as it is called, by which
what is implied is that the mind has to concentrate itself
on its own seat. Thereby it becomes easier to control the
mind than when it is moving away from its centre. Neither
should we close the eyes completely nor should we open the
eyes fully, which appears to be something like looking at
the tip of the nose. The idea is not that we should actually
concentrate on the tip of the nose, though that is one form
of concentration people generally try sometimes. What is implied
is that there should be a half closed posture of the eyes,
by which we neither close them wholly and get induced into
a mood of sleep or torpidity, nor do we open them completely
and be distracted by the presence of objects outside. Together
with this function we begin to breathe slowly, leisurely,
with a sense of freedom from engagements and obligations and
duties of every kind at that time. The Prana moves
calmly, harmoniously, beautifully, only when we have no commitments
psychologically. If we have any kind of engagement attracting
our attention inwardly, towards that direction the Prana also
will move. And the agitation of the Prana is due to distractedness
caused by the desires of the mind, by commitment to activity.
Hence, when we sit for meditation, there should be no preconceived
background of obligations of any kind. Otherwise, a part of
our mind, subconsciously or unconsciously, will be tying itself
to the engagements towards which also it has to move, and
which it has on its hands. When we sit for meditation, there
should be no back ground of obligations of any kind, except
the obligation to concentrate. It would be advisable for every
person who is after the practice of meditation to see that
immediate obligations are fulfilled before sitting for meditation.
Well, we cannot be free from all obligations, of course; that
is very clear. It does not mean that the entire commitments
of the whole of life should be stopped. That is not possible.
But there should not be any pressing need compelling our attention
elsewhere immediately. At least for a few hours we are to
be free, may be for half a day we have no engagements, and
then we feel a little bit of rest, there is a leisure felt
inwardly, then the Pranas automatically settle down of their
own accord, for there is composure of mind. There is also,
then, a spontaneous harmony of the movement of the Pranas.
The whole attention should be on freedom of the self in the
absorption of consciousness in God. The senses, the mind and
the intellect should stand together as if there is a single
flame of life emerging from the self within. Usually the senses
work somewhere, the mind is thinking something and the intellect
is acquiescing in the activities of the mind and sense;- they
never work in harmony. We are agitated personalities on account
of the lack of harmony among the senses, the mind and the
intellect. Like three flames of light joining into a single
flame,. the power of the senses and the power of the mind
and the power of reason should stand together in unison. And
the comparison given in the Sixth Chapter is that the flame
should be unflickering like the glow of the lamp which is
placed in a windless place. Such is the consciousness we attain
to when there is no desire behind the working of the senses
and there is no personal impulsion goading the mind towards
anything outside, and the reason is satisfied. One's only
goal is Moksha, salvation, and there is no other aim in life.
We have to be a hundred-percent convinced that Moksha is the
goal of life, the liberation of the spirit is the aim of all
our activities, all our studies, all our engagements, anything
that we do, in any manner. Non-hatred, non-anger, non-greed
follow automatically from this whole-souled attention of the
consciousness on the ideal of the salvation of the spirit
in the Absolute. This is Yoga in essence, says the Fifth Chapter. |