|
As all the works that we do in life aim at the fulfilment of a purpose, yoga
tends towards meditation. There is likely to be a prevalent notion among
students and seekers of Truth that meditation is a kind of activity like many
other activities in life. Instead of going for shopping, you go to the
meditation hall. Instead of doing one work, you do another. It becomes a
question of choice of activity, rather than a change in the quality of
activity. When you tell the mind that it has to do meditation, it is not likely
that it will always be in a state of rejoicing exhilaration. If you carefully
probe into your sub-conscience, you will discover this strange attitude from
within.
You will find yourself, to some extent at least, in a state of tension. It
will look that some duty is being imposed upon you. The mind is afraid of the
word discipline because of a peculiar meaning that is attached to it.
And that meaning is the frightening factor in discipline. Meditation is a
discipline in some respect, of course. We do not like discipline or
systematization of anything, because it appears that, thereby, we are going to
restrain the mind from its usual proclivities. The restraining of a desire is a
pain to the mind. It is not a joy; and if yoga, spiritual practice or
meditation is going to be any attempt to restrain the usual longings of the
mind, certainly, the mind is not going to be happy. There will be an
undercurrent of anxiety and resentment, in spite of the fact that the logical
intellect accepts the necessity for meditation and spiritual life.
Man is not made up merely of logic. The mind can set aside all logic in a
second if it comes to its attention that the logic goes counter to its deepest
desires. Logic goes to the dogs, and rational investigations will cut no ice,
before the pressure of instinctive longings, the desires of the heart, the
normal ways in which the mind works. This difficulty can also be regarded as an
obstacle to any tangible success in the practice of yoga. There are various
kinds of battle going on within us. There is a war that is always being waged
inside our own minds. It is true that we are like a house divided against its
own self.
We live in two worlds at the same time, the one pulling us in one
direction, the other in another direction. Who can deny that we have desires
and that these desires are not always desires concerning God? We have simple
tentacles which connect us with the different avocations of life and the
sentiments which become part and parcel of our existence. There are certain
things which we can never forget, in spite of our efforts. Who can forget that
one is an Indian national, a British, an American, and so on? We cannot get out
of the idea that we are born of some parents, that so-and-so is one's father,
mother, brother, sister, etc.
There are prejudices which are sanctioned politically, socially and
ethically as things quite normal and necessary. These normalcies are taken by
us as inseparables from our own lives, and these so-called inseparables are our
real foes. Our enemies are not persons, nor are they things. They are certain
ways of thinking. There are peculiar ruts of thought along which the mind
moves, like a train running on rails. It cannot change its direction except on
the rails, like a river that flows on its own bed which is laid out strongly.
Certain aptitudes of the mind are considered by us as normal and the only right
things that we can think of. These are the sentiments, our pet prejudices.
But to think in any segmented manner, isolating one aspect of life from
another, rejecting one way of thinking from another way of thinking, would be
the tendency of the mind to divide itself into a few sections with no proper organic
relation among the parts. Meditation is not an activity like the other works we
perform in the world. The first thing that we have to remember is that work
tires us, fatigues us, exhausts us and we wish to take rest after work. There
is a depletion of energy in every kind of work. Some part of the total quantum
of energy in the system gets diverted for the performance of the world. Energy
is lost in work. lf it is true that energy is lost in meditation also, we are
likely to say, "Yes, we feel exhausted; we cannot go on meditating for hours
together. It is a tedious job."
Meditation becomes a job rather than anything that is spontaneously
acceptable to the mind; it becomes a discipline and imposition when it is
something somebody asks us to do, rather than what we have accepted of our own
accord. A tiring work is that which someone wants us to do. A work that we take
upon our own selves, deliberately, cannot tire us so much, because, then, the
mind gets identified with the work. The dissociation of work from the organic
structure of the psyche is the cause of fatigue. Now, one may wonder, "What is
meditation? Is it a work?"
Every activity is a process of becoming. It is a tendency of the subject
to move towards an object. Here, by object, we need not necessarily mean
any concrete, solid substance. Anything that is conceivable in space-and-time
is an object; and if our thought moves towards any such thing outside, in the
direction of the object, it requires a flow of energy from the whole system.
Perception, cognition, or any decided act of consciousness requires an amount
of energy to flow from the subject to the object. The sage Patanjali mentions
psychological functions, or vrittis, spoken of as klishta vrittis and aklishta vrittis, etc., meaning thereby the psychosis of the mind
operating in the processes of perception, cognition and feeling, all which he
regards as obstacles in yoga.
The perception of an object is considered an obstacle in yoga. Now, if we
perceive a tree, what is the difficulty about it? "I am enjoying the perception
of a tree, or the rise of the sun or the moon, or a beautiful flower. How do
you call it an obstacle?" We can know why this is an obstacle only when we go
deep into the structure of the mind itself, in its relation to reality as a
whole. What we call meditation in the spiritual sense, strictly, is not a work
that is performed by the mind in respect of an object outside. It is not a
tendency to becoming, but rather it is a tendency to being. These
are significant terms, whose meaning should be clear to us. What is becoming?
What is being? And what is the difference between the two?
Becoming is an active process of transformation of conditions
or events in the direction of a goal that is yet to be reached externally in space
and time. Everything changes into something else, transforms itself from one
condition to another. And this tendency of things, to transformation into a
different state, is indicative of restlessness characterising the condition in
which they already are. There is this restlessness because it is dissatisfying
to be in that condition for a protracted period.
It is dissatisfying because it does not indicate what one requires. What
is required is outside oneself, and, so, there is a spatial movement, a temporal
activity, outside oneself, in the direction of some conceivable goal. Thus, becoming is an objective movement of consciousness. Meditation is not any movement
towards an object outside it, though in certain types of meditation, it may
appear that we are meditating on some object. Even here, the movement is only
an appearance and is not really an activity in the sense of an alienation
towards objects. We shall come to this point again a little later.
Being is different from becoming. The difference should
be ostensible. While becoming has a tendency to transformation in the
direction of something outside itself, being is a tendency to its own
self; it is a self-withdrawal into the core of one's own being and not an
isolation of oneself into something other than what oneself is. "What is an
object, and what is a subject?" is a question, again, before us. What do we
mean by an object? Anything that we cannot regard as identical with ourselves,
anything which is, from our point of view, totally disconnected from what we
regard ourselves to be - that is an object, a "This-is-not-me."
And anything with which we are vitally connected in an inseparable manner,
in whose context we affirm a self-identity - that is a subject. When we speak of
subjects and objects, we naturally refer to consciousness which plays an
important role in all experience. It is the consciousness of some particular
circumstance that brings about the distinction between subjectivity and
objectivity. The consciousness of a thing dissociates itself from that thing
and assumes the presence of some spatial distance or, at least, a spatial
difference logically conceived between itself and the object. But when no such
spatial distinction can be conceived between the object and consciousness, then,
there is no object; it is only subject. Consciousness alone can be the subject;
everything else is object.
|