|
On the Evolution of Life
There is no precise saying as to when a
lower species evolves into the higher one. Since personal agency in action
cannot be attributed to sub-human species, all evolution below the human level
is supposed to be a spontaneous fulfilment of the vast purpose of Nature. The
progress of the sub-human organism, or the rise from the lower condition of the
soul to the higher, is considered automatic as a spontaneous action of the
universal Nature in the case of all beings who are free from the egoism of
personal agency in action. Personal effort comes into relief only at the human
level wherein consciousness becomes self-consciousness, an individual affirmative
urge, whereby this centre of affirmation is severed from the supporting hand of
the universal nature and self-effort on the part of one's own individual self
becomes the well-known drudgery of life. The animal Nature when it rises to the
human level will, in the natural course of things, take higher births,
gradually, provided right thinking harmonious with the total universe motivates
its thought and action. The sufferings of animals, as with sufferings of human
beings, in whatever way they be called, are already touched upon in their
essential causational circumstances, in what we have considered already above
in a different context.
On the Conditions of Reincarnation
At the time of death, the individuality
does not get dissolved, though the physical constituents may be separated and
dissolved. What is it that takes rebirth? It cannot be the body, because it is
discarded and it is dissolved into the physical elements of which it is
composed. It cannot also be the Atman, because the Atman is a Universal
Presence which cannot be said to be subject to transformation of any kind, such
as transmigration. What else does transmigrate?
The peculiar thing called the individual is
neither the body nor the Atman. It is a strange admixture of localised self-affirmation
in terms of space and time, and this principle of self-affirmation is
impossible to define except as a peculiar pressure-point or force which is
generated by the influence of space-time upon consciousness which by itself is
indivisible. This point of pressure spatio-temporally occasioned is in fact the
centre of what is known as the psyche, often called the mind, sometimes known
as the Chitta or the Antahkarana, in the Sanskrit language.
This pressure of consciousness causing the
individual self-sense may be broadly understood as having three levels of
empirical expression, viz., the conscious, the sub-conscious and the
unconscious. Only the conscious level operates when a person is awake, the
sub-conscious operates in dream, and the unconscious in deep sleep. The
conscious impulses and activities of the individual are limited expressions of
the desires which seek to fulfil themselves by way of contact with sense
objects. When the pressure of desires is too much and they cannot be easily fulfilled
under conditions prevailing in the waking state, they operate as reveries in
dream as a sort of satisfaction of strong. impulses incapable of operation
during waking state. But the desires of an individual are so immense and
complicated that their satisfaction cannot be really achieved in a single life.
Such unfulfilled longings get wound up in unconscious states, a specimen of
which is deep sleep. It is the power of unfulfilled desires that acts like a
projectile and drives like a rocket this complex known as the individual
pressure-point in the direction of manufacturing a new apparatus for their
fulfilment under expected conditions, this new apparatus being called the newly
formed body. Here is the interesting background of what is known as rebirth.
As a realised soul has no desires, it has
no rebirth. Hence the passing away of an ordinary person and the disappearance
of a person like Lord Krishna have nothing in common. The energies which are
elemental that go to contribute to the formation of a new body in the case of
an individual with unfulfilled desires do not operate in the case of a realised
soul, because rebirth is caused by the magnetic pull exerted by the desiring
centre of consciousness upon the physical elements, the forces of Nature outside.
Such a desire being absent in realised souls, they have no rebirth. They merge
into Universal Being. The legacy which acts as the link between the here and
the hereafter is desire, which causes reincarnation. The legacy so-called is a
mysterious admixture of consciousness and desire, which is the causative factor
behind rebirth. It is neither the physical body formed of the five elements,
nor the Atman which is all-pervading. It is not true that in death the
apparatus through which thinking and feeling act is destroyed; it continues in
spite of the body being destroyed. The screen of the Television which projects
the picture of individuality is the point of consciousness-desire, explained
above, and it is not destroyed when the body is destroyed. It is true that, in
a way, our waking life is also a reflection of some other anterior existence,
which we do not remember now, since we are now in this world in a different
space-time continuum, totally different from the space-time complex of the
previous life. It has to be reiterated that death does not destroy the link
between this life and the other life, because death is only of the physical
body, and everyone knows well that a person is not exhausted by the physical
frame only. There is something more in man than what appears to the eyes, or to
any sense organ.
The modern theory of evolution from matter
to plant, from plant to life, from life to mind and from mind to intellect is
but a corroboration of there being a continuous link from one state of life to
another. Else, there would be no evolution and there would be no meaning in any
form of life at all. All this requires deep study, and a mere cursory reading
of one or two textbooks may not be adequate. The principle involves vast areas
beyond the ken of the studies provided in our modern colleges and
universities.
The theory of Karma, or the
principle of reaction, which conditions the notions of good and bad etc., is
not supposed to apply to the sub-human species since they do not have the
self-consciousness of personal agency in action and are just guided by the
natural forces of evolution. Suffering cannot be attributed to an individual as
long as it is free from personal agency in action. The sub-human species evolve
in the same way as there is rise of life from matter to the vegetable kingdom,
etc., as mentioned. This is not caused by Karma, but by the very
pressure of universal evolution.
If there is no transcendent meaning beyond
the present life of the human being, no one would lift a finger, or do anything
in this life, unless he is an idiot of the first water, knowing well that the
next moment death may overtake anyone, and no one can be sure that one can be
alive after a few minutes more. Who on earth will try to do anything in this
world if the next moment is uncertain, unless it is to be accounted for by an
unconscious pull of the transcendent 'Beyond' which speaks in the language of
Eternity that there is life beyond this medley of uncertainties, anxieties and
insecurities here on earth? The very point that man is to be restrained from
undesirable behaviour and action can have meaning only if there is something
more than the meaning seen in earthly life. Else, what is the point of being
good or exhibiting good behaviour? Why should there be morality, why should
there be anything at all, since everything is going to be devoured by death the
next moment? Reincarnation is demanded by the subjection of the finite to the
inexhaustibility of the Infinite.
|