|
But, if anything is at all to be said about the Ideal and Goal of life of
an individual, we cannot get on with such a perplexing conception of Reality.
To us Reality is what can be the highest in the strict logical sense. Though
Reality transcends logic and reason, philosophy cannot do so, for nothing in
this world is possible without the functioning of thought in some way or the
other. We are thinking beings, and to us all that is real must be intelligible.
If anything is unintelligible, we can have no relations with it. The Real is,
therefore, Being, rather than non-being, Consciousness, rather than
unconsciousness, Bliss, rather than pain. There is no sense in non-being, for
non-being also must at least "be" Consciousness itself is being, and unless
even non-being and unconsciousness are objects of consciousness, there can be
no meaning in them.
"How can being be produced from non-being?" -Chh. Up. VI. 2. 1.
"The sacred teaching is that It is Being of being." -Brih. Up. II. 1. 20.
It is Being that gives existence even to non-being. Being covers non-being
from both sides. In the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (V. 5. 1), the word "satyam"
is explained as constituting the three syllables 'sa', 'ti' and 'yam',
the first and the last syllables being truth and the middle one untruth, thus,
truth covering untruth from both sides, and the unreal world acquires the
semblance of truth by being within the Truth which is incorruptible Being. And,
further, Truth alone is said to triumph, not untruth (Mund. Up. III 1.
6), thus giving a distinct reality to what "is" as contrasted from what "is not".
That which changes is untrue and that which is constant is true. Non-being
vanishes into Being which comprehends in itself the highest possible values
which are the aim of the general aspirations of all individuals. No one wants
not-to-be, everyone wishes to exist in some form or the other. The truth of Being
as the highest principle is ingrained in the consciousness that underlies all
cogitating beings. The Maitrayani Upanishad says that Brahman is "One and
limitless, limitless to the east, limitless to the south, limitless to the
west, limitless to the north, and above and below, limitless in every
direction; for it directions like east exist not, no across, no below, no
above; this Paramatman is incomprehensible, infinite, unborn, not to be
reasoned about" (VI. 17). Such a one cannot be a non-being. It is existence in
its greatest completeness. Extreme and intense existence appears as
non-existence. The extreme of positivity of the Real appears as a negation of
everything. It is dark due to the excess of Light. It is imperceptible, for it
alone is the perceiver. It is unknowable, for it alone is the knower. It
appears to be nowhere, because it alone is everywhere. It appears to be
nothing, for it alone is everything.
Brahman is established "on its own Greatness, or, rather, not on greatness
at all" (Chh. Up. VII. 24). It is the divisionless, partless, mass
of plenitude - on what can it establish itself? The Self-existent Brahman is
supported by nothing, for everything is supported by it. It is childish to say
that it has established fame, though its Name is "Great Fame" (Svet. Up. IV. 19). "Here, on earth, people call cows and horses, elephants and
gold, servants and wives, fields and houses as constituting greatness"; but
Brahman is not of the greatness of this type, because here greatness is
dependent on an external object. The greatness of Brahman lies in its own
Being, and not on anything second.
"Brahman alone, the Greatest, is this whole universe." -Mund. Up. II. 2. 11.
"Verily, that Great, unborn Self, undecaying, undying, immortal, fearless,
is Brahman." The whole of Reality is not exhausted in this world-process. "Encompassing
the whole universe He extends beyond it to infinity. Whatever is here is this Purusha
alone, whatever was and whatever will be. He is the Lord of immortality. Such
is His greatness yet the Purusha is greater still. All beings are
one-fourth of Him, His three-fourths hail as the immortal beyond the dust of
the earth" (Rig Veda, X. 90). "Unmoving, it is swifter than the mind", for the
I Real which is the Self is presupposed by all forms of thought. "The senses
fall back in trying to reach it." "Ahead of others running, it goes standing." "It
moves, and it moves not", it is other than what is static and kinetic. "It is
far, and it is near; it is within all this, and it is outside all this." It is
the Self, the being of all. "Sitting, it goes far. Lying, it moves everywhere."
"It is manifest and hidden." Such metaphorical definitions of Reality point to
the central meaning of its absoluteness of character. That which does
everything does nothing in particular. All speculations about the nature of the
Ultimate Principle finally lend themselves to the unanimous conclusion that it
is eternal, infinite, unconditioned, non-dual, absolute, existence. "It is
without an earlier and without a later, without an inside and without an
outside, the Being of the Self of all, the Experiencer of everything."
Yajnavalkya describes the Supreme Being thus: "An Ocean, the One, the Seer,
without duality it is. This is the State of Brahman. This is the supreme goal.
This is the supreme prosperity. This is the supreme abode. This is the supreme
bliss. On a part of this bliss other creatures are living." "It does not become
greater by good action, nor inferior by bad action." In the words of the famous
Nasadiya Sukta of the Rig Veda, the original condition of existence was a total
absence of the world, the sky and all manifestation. There was neither death
nor immortality, for both of these are correlates which have no valid recognition
in Reality. There was neither night nor day, but That One, the source of light
existed without motion and change. It existed as identical with its Power,
there was no difference between temporality and eternity. Other than it there
was nothing. Even the gods cannot say how this creation was caused, for even
they were born after creation. That Source from which the universe sprang, That
alone can sustain it, none else. That One alone knows the truth of its
creation, or else, who can know it? The Real alone knows the Real. None else
can know it. To know the Real is to be the Real. We cannot stand apart from it
and at the same time know it. The moment we undertake the task of seeking the
Real, we simultaneously start digging the grave for our separate individual
existence. The glorious consciousness of the supreme Truth is the complete
transcendence of the niggardly clinging to forms which appear to be other than
one's own Self, and to one's own apparently individual localised life. To live
in the Absolute which is real is to die to the individual which is unreal.
"He becomes non-existent, who knows that Brahman is non-existent. Who knows
that Brahman exists, is said to exist truly." -Taitt. Up. II. 6.
Not to know the Whole is to be limited to the part-consciousness which is
not truly existent, which is mortal, and hence, equal to non-being in the
absolute sense. To truly live is to be conscious of the Real Existence which is
without the disease of transformation and death. "All creatures have Existence
as their root, Existence as their abode, Existence as their sole support." All
forms are shadows of Pure Existence which alone endures in past, present and
future, while the shadows perish like bubbles in the ocean. In the Real
existence and content are identical. Hence, everything is mere existence, which
alone is real. "As birds resort to a tree for a resting place, even so it is to
this Supreme Being that all here resort for their existence." "Not by speech,
not by mind, not by sight can it be grasped. How can it be known except by
admitting that it simply 'is'?" (Katha Upanishad VI. 12). It is the hard
Reality, "the great Terror, the raised-up Thunderbolt, through fear of which
the fire burns, the sun gives heat, the wind blows, Indra showers, Death does
its duty! " "The Brahmanas and the Kshatriyas serve as its meal, and death
itself is its condiment." "At the command of that Imperishable, the sun and the
moon, the earth and the sky are held in their respective positions. At the
command of that Imperishable, the moments, the instants, the days, the nights,
the fortnights, the months, the seasons, the years, stand differentiated in
their own places. At the command of that Imperishable, some rivers flow from
the snowy mountains to the east, some to the west, in whatever direction each
may flow. Whatever great actions one does in this world, even for thousands of
years, without the knowledge of this Imperishable, is finite. Whoever dies
without the knowledge of this Imperishable, is miserable" (Brih. . Up.).
"This Imperishable is Satyam, True Being." "'Sat' is the immortal and 'ti'
is the mortal. 'Yam' is that which holds the two together" (Chh. Up.
VIII. 3. 5). It rises above the mortal and the immortal, both of which are
relative conceptions. The highest is ritam and brihat, real and
great.
Thus, Being alone is the unavoidable basic experience, which is the
fundamental concept in philosophy. We can think away everything, but we cannot
think away that we are. Being is the very nature even of one who denies it. All
constituents of our thinking, all forms of existence, all modes of knowledge,
presuppose being. Being cannot lead us to non-being, for, the moment non-being
is known, it becomes being itself. But being is not an object of our immediate
empirical experience, for it is always a particular mode of being or, rather,
becoming that is the object of our relative experience. To us, individuals,
there can be no such thing as experience of existence-in-general. But eternal
being is general or absolute existence which cannot be confused or identified
with becoming which is a process. Brahman is not a process or a collection of
many particulars, not a multitude of many finites. No amount of accumulation of
relatives, however vast that may be, can make up the Absolute. An aggregate of
finites can give us a huge mass of finites, but not the Infinite - spatial
immensity or vastness is not infinitude. The Absolute transcends all finites,
but includes everyone of them. It does not become. It is. Becoming is not
completeness of existence, whereas perfect Being implies Fullness. The Absolute
does not grow or evolve. It is not a process stretching beyond itself. If it
were so, the Absolute would be involved in space, time and causation, and would
cease to be the Absolute. The Absolute is perfect Oneness and not a system of
plural beings co-existing as reals with action and reaction among themselves.
It is not a complex mass of relations. If the Absolute is considered as a
system, then its parts must be either identical with it or different from it.
If they are identical, their individualities are lost; if different, the
relation between them becomes unintelligible. The Absolute can only be Being
free from all kinds of differences. It must be Partless, Eternal, Homogeneous
Existence, "One only without a second." Existence is the most universal concept
which leaves nothing whatsoever outside it.
Existence is what is invariably present in all the processes of knowing.
Everything is known to exist, though the existence of a thing may be qualified
by the limiting factors which constitute the individuality of that thing. There
can be no idea or knowledge, no action and no value, not even life itself,
without existence. In the objective universe of names and forms there is the
permanent principle of existence underlying all names and forms. Even if
everything dies and is lost, the existence which supported that condition which
is no more, cannot die or be lost. Since existence cannot change, there can be
no death or birth for existence. Existence is eternal. The physical form of an
external object is subject to transformation, and this transformation is called
the process of birth and death. There is birth and death of forms, states,
conditions, modes, but not of existence. Existence is what enables us to know
that there is birth and death, that there is change and modification, etc. If
existence itself is not, nothing can be. Everything is in some state or
the other. Though everything is destroyed, the existence therein is not
destroyed. Since existence is the general reality of everything, it must be
infinite. Existence can have no limitations, boundaries or divisions either
within itself or outside itself. Existence is indivisible and is its own
explanation. Existence cannot be defined since it has no specific
characteristics, and since it never becomes an object of knowledge. It is the
reality of the object as well as of the subject. The body, the vital energy,
the senses, the mind, the intellect and even the very condition of all these
objective manifestations have as their reality this supreme Existence. The
realm of the knower and the known, i.e., the entire universe in all its aspects
and states, is ultimately found to be based on Existence which is imperishable.
The universe is a condition, a mode of experience, and this mode can have
meaning only when it is rooted in Existence which is at once eternal and
infinite. Existence, pure and perfect, is the Absolute, the supreme Brahman
proclaimed in the Upanishads.
|