|
Video
of this discourse Audio
Download:
Video Audio
Om Gam Ganapataye Namah
Om Gum Gurubhyo Namah
That all things in the world are very strange
phenomena, and are really something different from what they appear to be
to normal perception, is something that we have noticed in great detail.
Also we came to the conclusion that even if there is an inch of distance
between the aspiring consciousness and that which the consciousness is longing
for, that longing cannot be fulfilled. It is like an electrical connection.
Even if there is a little gap, though very minute, in the fixing of the plug
for allowing current to pass - even if there is a little distance, there
will be no performance. It will be as if nothing is happening.
This is the case with everything. The difficulty
before everyone is that we cannot think anything without some distance. Again
we are coming to the same old doctrine of spatiality and temporality, which
conditions our mind to such an extent that we cannot think anything - even
God Himself - except as being somewhere in high heaven, in vast space, and
some time before creation. If we feel God existed before creation, we are
bringing the time factor into it; and if He is very far in seventh heaven,
we bring the spatial aspect. This is a metamorphosis and emphasis in a transcendental
manner of a defect in the very thinking process itself.
Patanjali's great point in the exposition
of samadhis and samapattis is herein.
All achievement is perfect
union. Even a little conceptual distance between two things - consciousness
and its content - will not permit the implementation or the fulfillment of
the achievement. Even if it is God Almighty Himself, if He is half a foot
away from you, you can expect nothing from Him because there is a communication
gap between the Almighty and yourself as the seeking soul. A mighty thing
is before you, but there is no connection of an intelligible manner between
that which is before you and yourself.
This is the reason why many of our longings are
not fulfilled. Almost all the desires go frustrated. Everywhere there is
defeat of any kind of desire whatsoever. People go defeated completely. They
may get nothing out of what they actually expected. There is bereavement
always. What comes also goes at the same time. No one has come to stay forever.
That which comes also goes. Why should this happen? This is the picture of
mortal existence, the picture of the passing of things; and everything is
phenomenal, nothing is really existing. Everything is transient and, like
a wisp-of-wind, everything blows in whatever direction it wills.
But the seeker of immortality - kaivalya moksha, eternity,
where rebirth of any kind is stopped completely - that aspirant aspires for
that which is inseparable from the aspiring consciousness. The content of
consciousness should not stand outside consciousness. It may be physical,
visual or conceptual, but when you think a thing, that thing which you are
thinking should not stand outside the thinking process. It should be immersed
in the thinking process, so that in thinking a thing, the thinking gets enhanced
in its quantum and intensity because of the entry of the thing which appeared
to be external to the thinking process. Thinking a thought or an object is
no use or of any benefit. The object of thought has to increase the potentiality,
content, dimension and intensity of the thought itself so that in thinking
a thing the mind becomes filled with a completeness of itself. It becomes
a plenum. Instead of a bare thinking abstract process, it becomes a completeness
in itself because the thought has become one with that which it thinks. This
is samadhi.
It was mentioned when we were dealing with the samadhis
- savitarka, nirvitarka, savichara, nirvichara etc. - that the final
thing that we have to encounter is space-time. There is no other obstacle
except that. Space-time keeps everything away from us. This is the whole
difficulty. So, in the higher forms of samapatti, samadhi,
the externality
imposed upon consciousness by the intervention of space-time is also made
an object of meditation itself - the so-called externality that keeps you
out from that which you are aspiring for. The devil himself becomes a god,
you may say. That devilish nature of things is due to the outsideness of
things. If you make that thing your own, you yourself become the so-called
devil, and as you cannot be a devil, you become a god immediately.
The condemnation of things that we are accustomed
to is due to the keeping of things away from us, as either desirable sections
or undesirable section. The most difficult thing in meditation is the identification
of space-time itself as the object of meditation. You are uniting yourself
not with something, but with space-time itself. Then the question of separation,
isolation, distance, temporality will not be there.
How on earth is it possible for the mind to make
space and time get included in its thinking process, as it is well known
that they condition the thinking process? Here is a transcendental feat that
the yogi has to perform, which no philosopher can understand.
The
feat of yoga is transcendental, super-philosophical, and no argument touches
here. When all the great thinkers and philosophers have told you that you
cannot think without space and time, how dare you? To overcome this limitation
itself you are trying to step over the very condition of your existence.
You are trying to go beyond that which has made you. Is it possible?
We are space-time stuff. We are not solid objects.
It is a peculiar apparition that seems to be in the form of this physical
body - an apparent condensation, indescribable though, of the peculiar structure
of space-time itself. You have heard people say, "All matter is puckered
space. A dent in space looks like matter." You cannot understand
how
it is possible. Space is bent where there are large bodies of matter. Experiment
has shown that when light passes through large bodies and the solar orb,
the light dents little bit, and the straight line is a little bit changed;
it looks as if light itself is bending in a semi-curvature form because of
the tremendous gravitational force of the large body which is the sun. How
can anybody imagine that light can bend into a semi-curvature? Who can imagine
that solid earth, like brick and mortar and iron and steel, is only a peculiar
adjustment of space-time within itself?
Can thoughts become things? We are sometimes told, "Thoughts
are things." It is horrible to hear. I want a thing, I do not want
a thought, but thought itself is that thing, because space and time are only
peculiar types of thought. They may not be individual thought, but they are
some kind of thought. There are three kinds of thinking - individual thinking,
interconnected thinking and transcendental thinking. Those philosophers
who tell us that space and time cannot be overcome are thinking in terms
of individual thought. When Berkeley, the great thinker, said that all things
are ideas, the question arose: "Whose ideas?" These huge
mountains
and stars - are they concretisations of Mr. So and so's
ideas?
So he had to modify his doctrine that it is not possible, because large expanses
of externality in the form of the world cannot be considered as modifications
of an individual's mind. "Understanding makes nature,"
said
Immanuel Kant. Whose understanding makes nature? Is it Kant's mind
that is creating the whole Germany and the entire globe of the earth? Then
he had to modify his thought in a subsequent edition of his book, wherein
he introduced a chapter called Refutation of Idealism. People were surprised
that he added another chapter in the second edition of his book - Refutation
of Idealism. This was because he had a suspicion that his doctrine almost
resembled Berkeley's when he said that understanding makes nature.
Whose understanding? His problem was same as Berkeley's, because
no
understanding of anybody can make nature. Nature was before we were born.
We were born later on, nature was existing earlier. How can we say that our
understanding makes nature? No. So, we have to make a clear distinction between
real understanding, the real idea, the real mind that seems to be concretised
into the objects of sense, and the ordinary sense.
As I mentioned, there are three kinds of thought.
There is purely individual thinking - as in my thought, your thought, etc.
There is interconnected thought. Interconnected thought means everybody
thinks, and every thing which does not appear to be thinking also thinks
in a potential prehensive manner, as philosophers call it. There is a distinction
that philosophers make between apprehension and prehension. We are apprehending
things, but things which do not apprehend through the intellect prehend.
The tree knows that we are here. It is not apprehending through the intellect,
but a subtle, deeper-than-intellect process is operating though it, and the
leaves can know that you are here, talking. Even the sun knows what is happening
in the world. The breath of the universe is operating through the breath
of every individual.
So there is an interconnected, universal, organic
operation taking place, which is the reason why we say that the world is
the body of God. It is a living embodiment of interconnected operations,
like the operation of our own body. The body, which is our own, as we call
it, is an organic integration where everything is subsistent to everything
else. Nothing depends on the other. Everything is everywhere. The cause is
the effect and the effect is the cause. Where there is a circle of operation,
one part is causing another part, we cannot know which is the cause and which
is the effect. Anything is the effect and anything is the cause, in a circular
form. Every part of the body is organic and aware of itself. There is no
dead part in our body; everything is alive everything. Even the toes and
the fingers and the nose and the eyes - they are all alive. They
contribute
their individuality for the purpose of the total organisation of the entire
body. In a similar manner is the cosmic setup.
So, apart from this so-called individuality -
even a cell of your body has an individuality of its own - your whole personality
can be seen in one cell of your body. From birth to death what is taking
place in you is inside in a mirror of a cell, which looks like one among
the many; but even that one among the many is many only, due to the interconnection
that it has got; and this is the interconnected consciousness or mind that
we think of. It is very difficult to imagine because imagining it is possible
only if you know the world is one whole and not made up of little fractions
or parts. This is the interconnected, organised form of thinking of the mind,
where apprehension and prehension go together, the material and conscious
also get blended, and matter and spirit cannot stand separate. This is another
kind of mind; and when people like Kant say that understanding makes nature
and mind is projecting the whole world, perhaps Berkeley or Kant are appearing
to say, without actually mentioning it in their books, that it is a larger
interconnected cosmical operation which can be said to be the cause of this
substantial, so-called physical world. We can say this, just as we say our
physical body is a form solidly taken by our collection of the karma potencies
that we have brought with us from our previous birth. Thoughts make things.
Our ideas have concretised into this body, this is what we call prarabdha,
and whatever ideas we are entertaining will become our next body. This is
what seems to be the implied suggestiveness of these great thinkers who said
that ideas are things and understanding makes nature. We have to read between
the lines and not take them literally for what they have said.
But there is a transcendental mind, a third kind
of mind. It is the mind - if at all we can use that word - of the Absolute.
We should hesitate to use such words regarding the Absolute because it will
raise the question of whether the Absolute is thinking. Absolute does not
think. It is just Being. The Being of the Absolute is the Thought of the
Absolute. How we can imagine such a thing? Therefore it is called transcendental;
it is beyond human conception. So, that has concretised itself into the whole
universe.
I mentioned something about Kant and Berkeley.
Now we go to Hegel. He says that ideas become nature. There is only pure
idea. Idea externalises itself into the form of this nature. How can we imagine
that ideas, which are abstract concepts, as it were, can become solid objects
like a tree, a stone, etc. He will not explain how. The author will not tell
us how ideas become things, because here again arises the same question as
to what idea it is, whose idea? Hegel's idea is not my idea or your
idea; it is, again, an idea of the interconnected organismic part of the
whole operation, or we may call it the Absolute conceived as if it is thinking.
These philosophers are very difficult people. If we take them literally,
we will get confused. So we have to go deep into it. Their intention is very
good, but the way they express it is so confusing. However, I am repeating
once again: The whole world is unsubstantial, we may say. Berkeley says that
the vault of heaven, everything, will crumble down as dream objects. What
does Shakespeare tell us: "We are made of such stuff as dreams are
made of." Don't you see hard substances in dream. You can
see
rocks, you can see gold, you can see silver, you can see railway trains,
you can see everything in dream. You can even hit your head against a wall
in dream; the wall is really there, you may bleed, the blood will come out,
in dream - but has it really taken place? How a thought can externalise itself
into an apparent space and time complex, and create a world of so-called
solidity is something that is illustrated in our dream experience. The world
is considered as a long deergha svapna. Deergha
svapnam idam jaaneem -
the Yoga Vasishtha says. You had a short dream, now here
is a long
dream. If you could manufacture hard things in your dream consciousness,
this cosmic mind, interconnected mind, transcendental mind can create this
world. If you say that your dream hardness does not really exist, that it
is a projection of your thought - the same thing is this world. The world
is a nihil, it doesn't exist; it is only an idea complex. All these
philosophers have said the correct thing.
Patanjali goes into this subject. Because of this
feature of the so-called visible world, space and time are also ideas only.
Though it is said that the ideas are controlled and determined by the operations
of space and time, when you go further into the transcendental level you
will find that space-time cannot control the mind, unless it is an individual
mind. If you take it as an interconnected mind, then the space-time is included
in that. The world is not contained inside space, as Newton thought; it is
a part of the world itself. The world is nothing but space itself, and so
space is not a cup inside which the matter is made. Therefore, the idea of
space and time should not trouble you in your meditation or samadhi.
You must have a little strength of imagination and power of will to feel
how the so-called troublesome externality of space and time becomes one with
the Absolute form of thinking - total identification of consciousness with
its own imagination, samadhi. It is a total identification
of your
imagination, the products of imagination, with the imagining consciousness
itself.
|