|
Concentration on internal centres is also
practised by Sadhakas according to their special predilections of temperament.
The process of psychological freedom achieved is similar to the one in
concentration on external points or forms, the only difference being that in
internal concentration the objects are only forms of thought instead of
physical locations or things. The idea of the 'external' and 'internal' is
really with reference to one's own physical body, so that it is more a
procedure adopted for convenience rather than a system which has any ultimate
objective significance. Whatever is concentrated upon externally may be
regarded as a psychological image in internal concentration. One special
feature which is discoverable only in internal concentration is that in this
method one can conceive any form of reality to one's own liking, which may not
have anything corresponding in the physical world, such as the ideas of
all-comprehensives, togetherness, unity, harmony, supreme abundance and even
such ideas as of Infinity, Eternity and Immortality. But the last mentioned
three ideas actually transcend the idea of internality and open up the concept
of the universal.
The idea of universality overcomes the
barriers of externality and internality created by the mind with reference to
the body and the personality and visualises all things, including one's own
individuality, as organically related to one another in a wider completeness to
which there are no such things as subject and object, or the seer and seen,
which are the outcome of self-reference by each particular individual in
contrast to other individuals and things. The universal is incapable of even
imagination since thought is always subjective and externalises the object.
Thus the concept of the universal should be regarded as almost an
impossibility. But, for purpose of meditation, a conceptual universal may be
presented before the mind through the mutual transference of meaning between
the subject and object, which would result in three alternatives: (1) Every
subject is also an object to others, (2) every object is a subject to its own
self, and (3) there is neither a subject nor object where there is mutual
determination among parts of a whole. Every unit of existence may be conceived
as a whole in itself, i.e., an organism, self-determined in every way. There
can be many such organisms, smaller and bigger in a series and the universe is
the largest organism. To conceive it as it would conceive itself is to be able
to think the universal. In meditation this technique would involve a little
effort of thought and of the will to maintain awareness of a transcendence of
the subject-object relation, in any of the ways suggested above. Since the
bodily individuality as a psycho-physical organism is maintained mostly by the
tension obtaining between itself and others which it regards as objects, any
procedure which will overcome or release this tension would be a welcome method
of contemplating the universal. The seekers who belong to this last category
should indeed be very rare and few in number, for this super-normal thinking is
not given to everyone because of the habit of the mind to pin faith in
sense-objects by isolating them from its own location. The Upanishads and the
Bhagavadgita are replete with descriptions of this state of consciousness,
wherein the multiformed universal is contemplated. Special mention may be made
of the 3rd and the 4th chapters of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, the 5th and
7th chapters of the Chhandogya Upanishad, the 11th chapter of the Bhagavadgita
as also the description of the Absolute in its 13th chapter. This is the way of
Jnana, pure knowledge or impersonal meditation.
The methods of meditation in Bhakti
or love and devotion emphasise the personal form of God more than the
impersonal and instead of the fixing of consciousness in its role as pure
awareness, as in the path of knowledge, direct emotion as love to the form in
which God manifests himself before the contemplative mind. The Vaishnava
theology conceives God in a fivefold series of manifestations known as Para or the Supreme, Vyuha or the group, Vibhava or the incarnation, Archa
or the symbol of worship and the Antaryamin or the indwelling. The Para
is God conceived as the transcendent creator, whose nature is awe-inspiring,
and his uplifted presence carries with it a feeling of inaccessibility and a
grand remoteness from the dust of the earth. Vyuha is God conceived as a group
of manifestations, known in Vaishnava scriptures as Vasudeva, Sankarshana,
Pradyumna and Aniruddha, corresponding almost to the mutual relationship of
Brahman, Ishvara, Hiranyagarbha and Virat in the terminology of the Vedanta.
Vibhava is God in an incarnation manifest in the planes of creation for
redressing the sorrows of the denizens of the planes. Archa is the image or
symbol used in external or internal worship, a limited form meant to help
concentration of mind on God through a finite focus which gradually enlarges
upon wider realities, stage by stage. Antaryamin is the counterpart of Para,
God as the indwelling presence, not far removed from creation as the creator
thereof, difficult to approach, but the very soul of creation, living within it
and capable of vital contact in any speck of space or atom of creation.
The path of Bhakti also conceives methods
of concentration of mind by Sravana or the hearing the glories of God,
Kirtana or singing his names, Smarana or remembrance of him, through
Japa, etc., Padasevana or adoration of his feet in his manifestations or
in his essential being, Archana or formal worship by ritualistic
methods, Vandana or prayer offered to God, Dasya or the attitude
of being a servant of God, Sakhya or the attitude of friendship towards
God and, finally, Atma-Nivedana or self-surrender to God. These are
various means of reaching the consummation of divine love by which the mind is
fastened upon God's existence and all his associated attributes as omniscience,
omnipotence, compassion, and the like.
The technique of concentration of mind in
the Yoga system of Patanjali is concerned more with the volition aspect
of the psychological organ than the understanding and feeling, as in Jnana and
Bhakti. The will plays here the prominent role and concentration is the effort
of the mind to fix its attention on the different degrees of reality, viz., (1)
the physical universe of five elements in terms of the space-time relation and
the relation of idea, name and form; (2) the five elements in themselves
independent of these relations; (3) the inner formative principles of the five
elements in terms of the space-time relation and the relation of idea, name and
form; (4) the formative principles of the five elements independent of the
relations; (5) the joy which follows from this concentration on transparent
being; (6) pure Self-awareness that ensues thereby; (7) retention of the memory
of the extermination of all mental forms in the finest essence of
Self-awareness and, lastly, (8) realisation of Pure Being as the Absolute.
A system of spiritual living known as Karma-Yoga
rarely gets associated with meditation. But Karma-Yoga is really meditation in
action and it is a Yoga by itself It is, however, difficult for beginners in
spiritual life to imagine how an action can also be a meditation, for action is
usually associated with movement, physical or psychological, while meditation
is regarded as attention in which all movement is checked. The action, which
Karma Yoga is, differs from this usual definition of action as distinguished
from concentration or attention of mind. An exposition of this method is mainly
found in the Bhagavadgita where expertness in action is identified with balance
in the attitude of consciousness. Yoga is not only supreme ability in the
execution of perfected action but is at the same time stability of
consciousness or equanimity of mind. The two aspects of this particular
technique cannot be reconciled as long as action is limited to the personal
activities proceeding from desire. Karma-Yoga is desireless action, which alone
can be consistent with spiritual consciousness. The Self which is pure balance
of existence is co-extensive with cosmic reality and can therefore be
reconcilable with action when it is transformed into an impersonal process of
spiritual being instead of a personal activity of individual desire. This
concept of spiritualised action is an advanced step in Yoga and cannot be
prescribed to novices who cannot imagine anything beyond their bodily
personality. But once the spirit is grasped, a seeker moves unscathed in life,
unaffected by likes and dislikes and contemplates divinity in all actions which
he identifies with the processes of the universe. In lesser concepts of
Karma-Yoga, it is defined as one's attitude to all activity as a form of the
movement of the properties of the external Nature, of which one remains an
unconcerned witness. It is also regarded as action performed in the spirit of
service of God or even service of humanity and all living beings, the fruits of
which the performer does not long for but offers up entirely to God.
In internal forms of meditation a special
feature is a system known as Kundalini-Yoga. Here, the human system in
its subtle make-up within is regarded as a microcosmic specimen of the universe
and attempt is made to manipulate the powers of Nature by the regulation of
forces within one's own individuality. The realms of the cosmos correspond to
the centres in the individual, which are accepted to be seven in number.
Concentration on these centres in the microcosm stimulates the forces lodged in
the centres which bear an intimate relation to the relative centres in the
macrocosm. Thus, meditation on these centres is tantamount to meditation on the
reality of the cosmos. Enormous details on such meditations are laid down in a
group of texts called Tantras, which enunciate methods of a gradual overstepping
of the grosser forms of Nature through ritual, worship, recitation of formulae,
regulation of breath and concentration of mind. Since some of the ways
prescribed in the Tantras seem to take the seeker along the roads of
sense-objects and the material Nature, though with a view to transcending them
in spiritual experience, the danger of a set-back or fall for the inexperienced
and the unwary is more in this path than in the other methods of Yoga. The
technique is very scientific but not entirely free from the fears of temptation
and retrogression when attempted by unpurified minds.
All the procedures of meditation are, in
the end, ways of awakening the Soul-consciousness which, in its depth, is, at
once, God-consciousness. What is apparently extraneous and outside one's body
gets vitally woven up into the fabric of one's being in rightly practised
meditation. In brief, meditation is the art of uniting with Reality.
|