|
Israeli Visitor: What about war?
SWAMIJI: If you are a resident of Iraq, you
will feel that the United States is doing some aggression, and it is very bad.
Suppose you are a resident of America; you may feel that Mr. Bush is right,
provided you are in sympathy with him.
It is a question of consequence, finally.
An act can be judged from the possible consequence of doing it, or not doing
it. If you do not do anything, what is the consequence? If you do, what is the
consequence? Use your discretion, as a statesman. Statesmen are those who can
visualise the future by inference drawn from present conditions. They do not
take any action suddenly without proper thought. If you take some steps, what
will be the consequence, finally? And, if you do not do anything, what will be
the consequence? You weigh these two consequences, and see which is proper.
Israeli Visitor: Can you
feel the result when you weigh the worth in one of these sides - "Is it still
worthwhile"?
SWAMIJI: As you say, war is never good.
Nobody will say that war is good, but then, why do people start war, if it is
not good? Everybody, even a person who starts war, knows that it is not good.
Why does he embark upon it? He feels that if he does not engage in war, maybe
it will be worse still. From bad, it may becomes worse. He may be right or
wrong; that is a different matter. If you don't wage war, it will be worse; so
wage war, and it is bad. So, it is a choice between bad and worse; the worse is
not good, so bad is better. This is how they choose.
We cannot discuss this just now, as we are
not sitting in the field and seeing anything, and also cannot directly connect
ourselves to it. Our judgments will be only theoretical. You are asking me a
theoretical question, without knowing the actual implications of the issues at
hand.
Israeli Visitor: I have been living in a country that has many wars, and this war,
for instance, for my country - I come from Israel - if it was not America fighting,
I know it would be my country fighting this war, some other time. But I try not
to look only from this point of view, because I know that this is very
conditional, because I am Israeli.
SWAMIJI: You see, you are Israeli, yes. You
will certainly wish that Israel should be protected, and somebody should not
attack, isn't it?
Israeli Visitor: Yes, it is true.
SWAMIJI: What will you do to protect
yourself?
Israeli Visitor: The question is, is protecting myself is more important than having
other people in safety?
SWAMIJI: Other people's safety also is
necessary. That is, of course, you do not want to go and kill somebody, but
your country also should be protected. How will you protect your country, then?
What is the method?
Israeli Visitor: Some people say to protect, you have to attack; some people say...
SWAMIJI: Generally, all countries have
forces which are called defense forces, but nobody has offense forces. Do you
know what offense is?
Israeli Visitor: To attack.
SWAMIJI: There are defense ministers, and
all that. You do not call them offense ministers. Why should you defend, unless
somebody offends? Now, who is there to offend? Nobody offends, because
everybody is defending only. What do you say? Everybody has a defense ministry;
no offense ministry. But somebody should be offending; only then, you want to
defend. But nobody says they are offending - they are only defending. Now, what
is the point? Who is the offender?
Israeli Visitor: True.
SWAMIJI: But, one does not say like that.
The man whom you say is offending will say he is not doing like that, but that
he is only defending himself against possible trouble. He wants to defend himself
against future trouble, though it looks like offending. This is what he will
say, though you may say that he has made a mistake and that he is offending.
You place yourself in the position of the
leader of the country, and then think through that mind. What will you do at
that time? That is the answer to your question. Suppose I am the head of this
particular country; what will I do at that time? How will my mind work? Now,
you are judging somebody else. That is no good. You judge yourself first, as
the person involved in it - at that time, what would you do? Then, you will see
that your heart will tell what is good for you.
Life is a mutual anabolic and catabolic
activity, as is the case with one's own body. Creation and destruction are
going on simultaneously without a time-gap in every organism for the purpose of
a higher form of survival. This is so in humanity as well as Nature as a whole.
|