 |
| Part I: The Samadhi Pada |
|
| Chapter
25: Sadhana - Intensifying a Lighted Flame |
|
Listen to the audio of this discourse
Download the MP3 audio |
|
In the practice of one reality,
ekatattva abhyasah, mentioned by Sage Patanjali in one of his sutras
for the purpose of restraining the modifications of the mind, there are, again,
grades of approach. The one reality is not necessarily the Absolute Reality,
though that is the aim, ultimately. As was mentioned previously, a reality, for
the purpose of practice, is that condition which can fulfil a particular need
of a specific state of mind under a given condition. So until the Absolute
Reality is reached, all other realities are relative realities. Every reality,
as far as we are concerned empirically, is relative - subject to transcendence.
Nevertheless, it is a reality to us, which only goes to prove that we are also
only relative realities. We, as individuals, are not absolute realities and,
therefore, we are satisfied with what is relative. We are not in daily contact
with the Absolute; what we are in contact with is a relative reality. And
inasmuch as the subject experiencing and the object experienced are on the same
level or degree of reality, it goes without saying that the empirical subjects
that we all are come under relative reality, and not the Absolute
Reality.
In the concentration of the
mind on one reality, ekatattva, what is intended is that the attention
should be focused on a system or order of values which is immediately superior
to, or transcendent to, the current state of affairs, the present state of
experience, and the conditions through which we are passing through at this
moment. Anything which can include particulars in a more organised whole can be
regarded as a higher reality for this purpose. There are tentative realities
created for the purpose of practical convenience by organisations, associations
or systems which we have created for the purpose of subjugating the individual
ego and compelling it to affiliate itself to a larger body to which also it
ought to belong and is made to belong.
I can give you examples of
quantitative systems which we create in our practical daily life for the
purpose of overcoming the urges of the ego and connecting it with wider or larger
wholes. A physical individual, or a bodily person, is the lowest unit of
reality as far as our experience goes. An utterly selfish individual is one who
looks upon the body as the ultimate reality, and the only reality - there is
nothing else. Now, this is the grossest form of egoism, where the bodily
individuality is regarded as the only reality and everything else is completely
ignored. This is the animal's way of thinking, to some extent. The tiger has no
concern for anything except its own personal existence, and it can pounce on
anyone for the sake of its own security and existence.
The animalistic way of thinking
persists in the human level also, and often - many times, in fact - the urge to
assert one's bodily individuality vehemently gains the upper hand, though
rationally it would not be possible for anyone to justify the exclusive reality
of a bodily personality. Such was the primitive condition of people in
prehistoric times, or Paleolithic times, as they say, when human beings were
not yet evolved to the present condition of social understanding. In the
biological history of mankind, right from creation as far as the mind can go,
it is said that the evolution of the human individual, right from the lowest
levels, included certain conditions of human existence which were inseparable
from animal life. The caveman, the Neanderthal man and such other primitive
types of existence point to an animal mind operating through a human body,
where cannibalism was not unfamiliar. One could eat another, because the animal
mind was not completely absent even in the human body, and there was insecurity
on account of it being possible for one man to eat another man. As history
tells us, it took ages for the primitive mind to realise the necessity for
individuals to come into agreement among themselves for the purpose of
security. If I start jumping upon you and you start jumping upon me, both of us
will be unhappy and insecure, and you would not know whether you will be safe
and I cannot know if I will be safe. This sort of thing would be most
undesirable.
It is said by anthropologists,
historian's of mankind's evolution, and political historians, that a state was
reached when it was felt necessary to organise people into groups, and this was
the beginning of the governmental system. A government is nothing but an
agreement among people in order that there may not be warfare among individuals
and attacks every day. Otherwise there would be chaos and confusion, and anyone
could attack at any moment, for any reason whatsoever. Therefore, an
agreement was made, an organisation was set up, a rule was framed and a system
was brought forth under which it was obligatory on the part of individuals to
obey certain principles laid down by groups, of which some people were made
leaders. It does not mean that these leaders were kings or autocrats; they were
the governors of law, the dispensers of justice, and the instruments for the
maintenance of order in the group of people who found it necessary to bring
about this system.
Here we have a higher reality
than the individual, quantitatively speaking, though qualitatively we cannot
say that there was an improvement. While there is a quantitative improvement in
an organisation or a set-up such as a government, in the sense that an
individual is made a part of a larger body so that the egoism of the individual
cannot operate as forcefully as it could have operated when it was left alone
and given a long rope, a consideration for the welfare of other individuals in
the system becomes obligatory on the part of every individual on account of the
presence of this order and system. So far, so good. From the point of view of
the quantity of the reality that has been introduced into life - the
mathematical measure of the order that has been set up - we can say that a
society is a larger reality than the individual. A nation is a larger reality
than a community, and the entire set-up of mankind, the international system,
may be regarded as a still larger reality than a single nation. This is a
quantitative evaluation of the reality toward which the human mind seems to be
aiming, for the purpose of bringing peace on earth, happiness, etc.
But, this is not the type of
reality which Patanjali had in mind, though this type of reality cannot be
completely ignored. While it is true that a social system is a quantitatively
higher reality than an individual body, because for obvious reasons life
without it would be impracticable, it is not wholly true that an ordered
society is qualitatively superior to the individual, which is the reason that
insecurity within society still persists. Even with the best government there
can be insecurity and unhappiness because, after all, individuals are behind
this quantitative system called this ordered whole. A hundred million thinking
people cannot always be qualitatively superior to one thinking man. After all,
it is man who is thinking, and not God. We must know that. A hundred million
people thinking, means only people are thinking - only man is thinking. So
qualitatively, it is only human thinking, though quantitatively it has a larger
force on account of the inclusion of many individuals.
This is a very interesting
subject in political science, where political thinkers differ in their opinions
as to whether there is a total absence of improvement in quality when there is
social order, and there is only a quantitative increase, or whether there is
also an element of an increase of quality in thinking. This has led to
divergent opinions among statesmen and political philosophers - right from
Plato and Aristotle onwards, through to Chanakya and other thinkers in India -
where the opinion swung like a pendulum. One side held that there is absolutely
no improvement in quality, though there is a large improvement in quantity, and
the other side thought that there is an element of qualitative superiority. We
are not going to discuss this subject at present, as it is outside the
jurisdiction of our current topic.
However, the point on hand is
that a larger reality should also be qualitatively superior to the discrete
particulars from which the mind is supposed to be withdrawn for the purpose of
the practice of yoga. Though it is somewhat easy to bring about a quantitative
increase in the concept of reality by methods such as the ones I just
mentioned, it is a little more difficult to introduce a qualitative increase
into the concept of reality. This is the main difficulty for everyone. However
much we may concentrate on God, we will not be able to improve upon the human
concept, even when there is a concept of God. So we feel unhappy even when we
are meditating on God, because we have not improved the quality but have only
increased the quantity, so that we may think of God as a large human individual
- a massive individual, as expansive as the universe itself, for example. That
is quite wonderful, but still this human thought does not leave us.
Even when we think of the
Creator as a transcendent father, the anthropomorphic idea still persists and
stultifies the aim at introducing a higher quality of thought into the concept
of God. That is why we are unhappy even in meditation, even in our highest
spiritual exalted moods. Even when we are exalted, we are quantitatively
exalted; qualitatively, we are very poor. We are unhappy in some way or the
other, and no one can make us happy. A tremendous effort is necessary to
introduce a superior quality in the concept of reality. The difficulty lies in
the mind being the only instrument that we have for doing anything whatsoever,
and who is it who will introduce a higher order of value or a greater quality
into this concept, other than the mind itself? But how can we expect the mind
to conceive of a higher quality of reality other than the one in which it has
found itself at the present moment? How can we jump over our own skin? Is it
possible? How can we expect the mind to think of a reality superior in quality
to the one in which it is living at present, and with which it is identified
wholly? An immediate answer to this question cannot be given. However, there is
an answer.
Sadhana is a very mysterious process. It is not
like the ordinary efforts that we put forth into our workaday life. Every
effort, even the first effort in the practice of sadhana, brings about
an improvement. The impetus that is created by the first step that we take will
carry us forward with a greater impetus towards the next step by the generation
of a force which is superior to the powers of the mind in its ordinary
operations. Also, there is a peculiar something in human nature which is called
'aspiration'. It is difficult to understand what it actually means. It is not
merely a hoping for something in the ordinary sense. It is a surge of the soul's
force from within, and we must underline these words, 'soul's force', for it is
not merely the mental faculties. The soul's force rises up, wells up within us
in a totality of action, drawing forth the whole value that we are at present,
and pointing to something which is wholly other than the present whole from
which the soul is being drawn.
The meritorious deeds that we
performed in previous lives, the good karmas of our past produce a force
called 'apurva' in Mimamsa parlance. The good karmas of the past
are present in the mind even now as a kind of prarabdha, and when the prarabdha
is of a sattvic nature, it permits the rise of a novel type of asking by
the soul, which is called spiritual aspiration. It is this peculiar context -
which is inscrutable, of course, to anyone's mind - which brings a person in
contact with a Guru. How we come in contact with a Guru cannot be understood.
It is worked up by mysterious forces from within that are associated with the
good deeds of our past lives, etc., and which permit good actions in this
present birth. Such forces make it possible for us to think divine thoughts and
to take the initial step in the practice of yoga. It is this initial step, as
mentioned, which is capable of generating a peculiar potency, enough to carry
us forward to the next step. Like the chain reaction of an atomic bomb burst,
every step is automatically an urge towards another step.
The more we practise sadhana,
the stronger we become and the greater is our capacity to understand, to
enlarge our perspective of thinking and to contact reality in deeper
profundity. Many factors operate in spiritual practice. The good deeds that we
did in the past is one factor. The other factors are the associations that we
have established in society with wise people in this present birth, the
practical experience that we gain by living in this world, the initiation that
we receive from the Guru, and the wisdom that we acquire from the Guru.
Finally, the most mysterious, of course, is the grace of God Himself, which is
perennially operating, perpetually working, and infinitely and most abundantly
contributing to the onward march of the soul towards its goal.
The practice of yoga is nothing
but a conscious participation in the universal working of nature itself and,
therefore, it is the most natural thing that we can do, and the most natural
thing that we can conceive. There can be nothing more natural than to
participate consciously in the evolutionary work of the universe, which is the
attempt of the cosmos to become Self-conscious in the Absolute. Evolution is
nothing but a movement of the whole universe towards Self-awareness - this is
called God-realisation. Our every activity - from the cup of tea that we take,
to the breath that we breathe, from even the sneeze that we jet forth, to the
least action that we perform, from even a single thought which occurs in the
mind - everything is a part of this cosmic operation which is the evolution of
the universe towards Self-realisation. Therefore, the practice of yoga is the
most natural thing that we can think of and the most necessary duty of a human
being. Nothing can be more obligatory on our part than this duty. It is from
this point of view, perhaps, that Lord Krishna proclaims, towards the end of
the Bhagavadgita, sarvadharmānparityajya māmekaṁ
śaraṇaṁ vraja (B.G. XVIII.66): Renounce every other duty and come to Me for rescue
- which means to say, take resort in the law of the Absolute. This is the
practice of yoga, and every other dharma is subsumed under it and included
within it, as every drop and every river is in the ocean. In this supreme duty,
every other duty is included. There is no need to think of every individual,
discrete and isolated duty, because all duties are included in this one duty,
which is the mother of all duties.
This peculiar feature of
spiritual practice, sadhana, being so difficult to understand
intellectually, cannot be regarded as merely an individual's affair. Sadhana
is God's affair, ultimately. Spiritual sadhana is God's grace working.
Though it appears that is individual effort, it only seems to be so, but really
it is something else. Not even the greatest of philosophical thinkers, such as
Shankara, could logically answer the question, "How does knowledge arise in the
jiva?" How can it be said that individual effort produces knowledge of
God? Knowledge of God cannot rise by individual effort, because individual
effort is so puny, so inadequate to the purpose, to the task, that we cannot
expect such an infinite result to follow from the finite cause. The concept of
God is an inscrutable event that takes place in the human mind. Can we imagine
an ass thinking about God? However much it may put forth effort and go on
trying its best throughout its life, the concept of God will never arise in an
ass's mind or in a buffalo's mind. How it arises is a mystery. Suddenly, it
comes.
It has been said that all great
things are mysteries. They are not calculated effects produced logically by
imagined causes, but are mysteries, which is another way of saying that all of
this is unthinkable by the human mind. Knowledge somehow arises. One fine
morning we get up and find that we are fired with a love for God. What has
happened to us? Why is it that we suddenly we say, "Oh, today I am something
different." Why we are something different today? From where has this
inspiration come? Nobody knows what has happened. If we read the lives of great
masters, sages and saints, we will find that they were all suddenly fired with
a longing which they could not explain, and no one can explain ordinarily. That
knowledge, that aspiration, that love of God has not come from books. It has
not come from any imaginable source. It has simply come - that is all. How?
Nobody knows.
Inasmuch as it is a
super-logical mystery, there would be no necessity on our part to investigate
the causes thereof and the methods thereof, logically or scientifically, beyond
a certain limit, though logical and scientific thinking is a help to
corroborate the presence of this aspiration. The aspiration is already present
within us. It is not created by logical thinking and, therefore, such logical
thinking is only a bulwark that we create to reinforce the aspiration that is
already there. We already have a faith in God. We already believe that God-realisation
is the goal of life. This belief has taken possession of us already, and now
all that we do is only an ancillary process which is contributory to
strengthening this aspiration and enabling it to become more and more potent
and influential in our daily life. We cannot create a concept of God by any
amount of effort.
Sadhana is nothing but the intensifying of this
flame that has already been lit up in us by God Himself, ultimately. You have
been led to this study due to God's grace. It is not because you have money to
purchase a book. It is not money that has brought you these discourses, it is
not your effort that has brought you to these discourses - it is nothing of the
kind. It is a divine mystery that has operated in a very inscrutable and
marvellous manner for a purpose which is cosmic in significance, and not merely
individual, as we may imagine. You have been led to this study for a cosmic
purpose, and a divine purpose, which is a coincidence and a collocation of
factors which can be understood only by the Cosmic Thinker, God Himself. I have
always been holding that, ultimately, it appears to be God who is doing sadhana
for God-realisation, and nobody else can do it; and meditation is nothing but
God thinking God.
|